HS2031 Unit Title Human Computer Interaction (HCI) Assessment

Assessment Details and Acquiescence Guidelines
Trimester T1 2020
Ace Code HS2031
Ace Title Human Computer Interaction (HCI)
Assessment
Type
Assembly Ordinance
Assessment
Title
HCI – Portraiturer Interface Delineation
End of the
assessment
(with ULO
Mapping)
Students accomplish be talented to:
c. Unfold skills in subtle and evaluating interactive methods and webinstalled applications
d. Apply experience of hypothetical set-upations of HCI to serviceable situations
Weight 20% of the aggregate assessments
Aggregate Tokens 100% scaled to 20%
Word season 2000-2500 say
Attributable Century Week 11
Submission
Guidelines
• Whole product must be resignted on Blackboard by the attributable century parallel with a completed
Ordinance Cover Page.
• The ordinance must be in MS Word coercionmat, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font
and 2 cm margins on whole filthy sides of your pcentury with embezzle minority headings.
• Relation sources must be cited in the extract of the tidings, and scheduleed embezzlely at
the object in a relation schedule using Harvard referencing name.
HS2031 Human Computer Interaction Assembly Ordinance Pcentury 2 of 5
Assembly Ordinance Instruction
The end of the tidings is to effect an evaluation intention coercion the Commonwealth Bank of Australia
(abbreviated CBA or CommBank). In this assembly ordinance (acme 5 students) you are required
to effect a non-functioning prototype, usability separation and heuristic evaluation intention coercion this
organisation, in the coercionmat of a tidings (2000-2500 say) instrumenting your delineation rationale.
Whole parts must add analogous to the ordinance and the walkthrough. Non-attendance at the
walkthrough accomplish balance a token of ZERO is awarded to the assembly part.
The ordinances accomplish be tokened 0 (Zero) if students do referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable flourish these
requirements:
– Assembly demands to resign the “Assembly Coercionm” parallel with their acquiescence.
– Assembly Blog: Whole the argument environing assembly ordinance demands to be chronicled by using Assembly Blog cat's-paw
(Instruction in adown, fascinate admonish your lecturer). The argument must applicable to the contenteded of the
ordinance and reflects the end of the assembly consultation.
– Whole ordinances must be resignted electronically ONLY, uploaded to Blackboard and Acquiescence of
SafeAssign. Acquiescence deadlines are strictly enforced and a slow acquiescence incurs penalties.
– DO NOT SHARE YOUR ASSIGNMENT WITH OTHER STUDENTS under no circumstances
even succeeding the deadline and succeeding you resignted it in the Blackboard. If there accomplish be any similarity
detected by SafeAssign or the tokener, it is an academic abandon event and BOTH of the assemblys accomplish
get ZERO and accomplish be tidingsed to the Dean academic.
Assembly Blog:
– Whole the assembly parts can examine environing the ordinance by using Assembly Blog. Once you are wholeocated
in a assembly, you can beware this exercise.
– Assembly > Assembly Cat's-paws > Assembly Blog > Create Blog Entry
HOW TO DO THE ASSIGNMENT:
CBA is an Australian multinational bank with transactiones athwart New Zealand, Asia, the Aceed States
and the Aceed Kingdom. It effects a multiformity of financial services including hawk, transaction and
institutional banking, funds conduct, superannuation, security, cannonade and broking services.
As an HCI speciaschedule team you entertain been requested to propound the portraiturer interface delineation modifications
coercion the CBA website and/or ductile app.
HS2031 Human Computer Interaction Assembly Ordinance Pcentury 3 of 5
REPORT STRUCTURE:
In your tidings fascinate flourish the adown structure:
1. Introduction – State the end and objectives of the tidings.
1. Argument – Build your arguments into a cohesive tenor, introduceing your observations and
findings that you entertain collated from minority (1) to (6) from ‘WHAT TO INCLUDE’ minority.
2. Recommendation – This is the minority where you introduce your recommendations. You should
cover minority (7) from ‘WHAT TO INCLUDE’ minority
3. Conclusion – Summarise your findings, consolidating and artifice vigilance to the deep points
of the tidings.
4. Relations. (a poverty of 10 relations)
WHAT TO INCLUDE:
1. Portraiturer Separation: You must entertain a distinct aim of the portraiturers of this method. Consider that referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable
everyone is comforttalented with the technology. Coercion amplifyment, you demand to traffic with portraiturer variation
such as century or langucentury skills.
2. Labor Separation: to identify the labors the germinative portraiturers accomplish discharge, and in what command.
3. Heuristic Evaluation: Consolicentury your findings from your portraiturer and labor separation and
propound a delineation and mention method requirements to realise the recommended interface. Coercion
example, the sum of items to exhibit, the cloak magnitude, what colours, how multifarious different
screens to exhibit, the devices to you, the tangible delineation.
4. Low-Integrity Prototype: Amplify a low-integrity (paper) prototype (a poverty of 4
screens). Installed on the overhead requirements, amplify a antecedent delineation of the portraiturer interface.
At this measure, the prototype is basically a average to patronage your primal concept and ideas. Coercion
example, the prototype should appearance where the applicable referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributablehing locations, how considerable information
would be introduceed on each cloak expectation. Low- integrity prototyping is deeply to wholeow delineationers
to effect resource delineations expediently extraneously having to go into profoundness or exerciseality.
Think of low-integrity prototyping as the 5D cat's-paw coercion: delineation, drain, career, disregard and do-over.
5. Feedback and Superintend: Discharge an space-between evaluation of your delineation by creating a method
of feedback and investigation 3-4 germinative portraiturers (e.g. friends, nobility parts, classmates, expectation.) to
complete the feedback coercion your low-integrity pamphlet prototype. Carry extinguished the evaluation according
to prescribed methods set-up in the extractbook (Shneiderman & Plaisant, 2017) or from other
scholarly sources.
HS2031 Human Computer Interaction Assembly Ordinance Pcentury 4 of 5
Portraiture embezzle superindicate techniques. Analyse the basis you entertain placid from the portraiturer
evaluation and referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributablee down any recommendations as to how you could brighten and correct on
your primal delineation.
6. High-Integrity Prototype: Installed on the portraiturer experiment feedback and recommendations amplify
a high-integrity prototype. The high- integrity prototype should be an online mock-up of your
proposal and should unfold some navigation, although it does referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable demand to product as a
complete interface. A poverty of 4 cloaks should be effectd in fitness to your
storyboard. The high-integrity prototype must be computer installed and any software is acceptable
including PowerPoint, storyboarding, expectation.
7. Evaluation Intention: Create an evaluation intention with recommendations on the cat's-paws and
methods you intobject to portraiture to evaluate the usability of your interface.
Upon the drift of the labor, you are to required effect a coercionmal tidings to instrument the labors and
the end of your efforts undertaken coercion the plan. Remember, this tidings is indicateed coercion your
employers and as such be professionally coercionmatted and introduceed. Your tidings accomplish patronage the viability
of your interface and as such demands to indoctrinate your employer that your interface delineation is satisfactory
and that it meets portraiturer solution experiment.
Marking Criteria Weighting
Separation – Portraiturer Separation and Labor Separation 15%
Delineation – Interface Delineation mention 15%
Prototype – Low-integrity Prototype and High-integrity 15%
Evaluation – Space-between Evaluation and Propoundd Evaluation Intention coercion the final
implementation
20%
Tidings – Professionally coercionmatted instrument including embezzle minoritys,
references, and bibliography
20%
Walkthrough – Professionally organised, amiable timing, cast and introduceation name,
embezzle contented
15%
TOTAL Weight coercion this ordinance tokening: 100 (Aggregate of
100 tokens to be scaled to 20% of express tokens coercion this ace)
100%
HS2031 Human Computer Interaction Assembly Ordinance Pcentury 5 of 5
Marking Rubrics
Grades Excellent Very Amiable Amiable Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Introduction /20 Unfoldd
excellent
ability to think
critically and
sourced
reference
material
appropriately
Demonstrated
very amiable
ability to think
critically but
did referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable source
reference
material
appropriately
Demonstrate
d amiable ability
to think
critically and
sourced
reference
material
appropriately
Demonstrated
satisfactory
ability to think
critically and
did referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable source
reference
material
appropriately
Did referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable
demonstrate
ability to think
critically and did
referable attributable attributable attributable attributable source
reference
material
appropriately
Discussion
/40
Demonstrated
excellent
ability to think
critically and
sourced
reference
material
appropriately
Demonstrated
excellent
ability to think
critically but
did referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable source
reference
material
appropriately
Demonstrate
d ability to
think critically
and sourced
reference
material
appropriately
Demonstrated
ability to think
critically and
did referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable source
reference
material
appropriately
Did referable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable attributable
demonstrate
ability to think
critically and did
referable attributable attributable attributable attributable source
reference
material
appropriately
Recommendation
/20
Logic is distinct
and manageable to
flourish with
strong
arguments
Consistency
logical and
convincing
Mostly
consistent
logical and
convincing
Adequate
cohesion and
conviction
Argument
is
confused
and
disjointed
Conclusion /10 Whole elements
are introduce
and very well
integrated.
Components
introduce with
good
cohesive
Components
introduce and
mostly well
integrated
Most
components
present
Proposal lacks
structure.
Harvard or IEEE
Relation name
/10
Distinct names
with excellent
source of
references.
Clear
referencing
style
Generally
good
referencing
style
Sometimes
clear
referencing
style
Lacks
consistency with
multifarious errors